Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-03-13 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3127 HB 428 Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 1, line 1, following Act through page 4, line 24: Delete all material Insert requiring the Department of Corrections to consider a lease-purchase option for the construction and operation of a correctional facility or facilities. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA: * Section 1. The Department of Corrections shall consider a lease-purchase option for the construction and operation of a new correctional facility or facilities in order to relieve overcrowding of existing correctional facilities. In considering this option, the department shall analyze (a) financing options; (b) construction and operating costs; (c) the department's overall strategy dealing with infrastructure and capital needs of existing facilities; (d) the affect a new facility would have on prison populations in various geographic regions of the state; and (e) the impact on health and safety of corrections' staff and prisoners. 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3128 HB 428 Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, line 27, after "contractor": Insert "; for purposes of this subparagraph, the state is unable to contract when (i) there are no responses to an invitation to bid, request for proposals, or other procurement notice for the facility's operation; (ii) there are no responsive bids received in response to an invitation to bid for the facility's operation; or (iii) the commissioner of corrections determines, for reasonable cause, that it is not in the best interests of the state to have the facility operated by a third-party under contract." 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3129 HB 428 Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, James, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, line 23, following "except": Delete "temporarily" Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3130 HB 428 CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, line 12: Delete anticipated Page 3, line 13, following total: Insert , and must not exceed annual appropriations for that purpose Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 9. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3131 HB 428 Amendment No. 10 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 3, line 4: Delete "private" Page 3, line 24: Delete "private" Page 3, line 27: Delete "private" Page 4, line 22: Delete "private" Insert "municipality or by a" Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 10 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 10 was not adopted. 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3132 HB 428 Amendment No. 11 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 2, lines 24-27: Delete ; and (C) may not be administratively restricted or limited by the commissioner to use only for prisoners involved in certain rehabilitative or treatment programs authorized by law. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 11 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 11. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 12 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 4, lines 21-23: Delete section 4 in its entirety Renumber the following sections accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 12 be adopted. Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Phillips, Robinson, Williams, Willis 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3133 HB 428 Nays: Austerman, Barnes, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 12 was not adopted. Amendment No. 13 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 1, line 6, following facility (title amendment): Insert in the Fourth Judicial District Page 3, line 5, following facility: Insert in the Fourth Judicial District Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 13 be adopted. Representative Vezey objected. Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 13. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 14 was not offered. Amendment No. 15 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 3, line 22, following ";": Delete "and" Page 3, line 27, following "contractor": Insert "; and (4) may not be constructed unless a significant proportion, if not all of the contractor's employees who will operate the facility will be covered by the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 15 be adopted. 1996-03-13 House Journal Page 3134 HB 428 Representative Mulder objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 428(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Sanders, Williams, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey Excused: Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 15 was not adopted. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB428(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Brown objected. The Speaker stated that CSHB 428(FIN) am would be in third reading on tomorrows calendar.